GeForce RTX 4080 vs H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2505MHz vs 1980MHz)
Lower TDP (320W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 716.8GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
48740
H200 SXM 141 GB
+37%
66910
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
132
9728
Shading Units
16896
304
TMUs
528
112
ROPs
24
304
Tensor Cores
528
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
700W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GH100
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
80 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
