Home Comparison GeForce RTX 4080 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

GeForce RTX 4080 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 +357%
48740
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10650

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
4096
304
TMUs
256
112
ROPs
256
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

320W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
379 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net