GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+6697%
48740
Radeon R7 250
717
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 4080
+4921%
28173
Radeon R7 250
561
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
512
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
