GMA X3100 vs FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3100 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GMA X3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
GMA Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
500.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Crestline
GPU Name
Devastator
Crestline-GM
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
