Home Comparison GRID M40 vs Quadro K5200

GRID M40 vs Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M40 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M40
793
Quadro K5200 +348%
3553

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
793.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
24.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net