HD Graphics 520 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 520 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 161% (2350MHz vs 900MHz)
832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 520
346
Arc 140T Mobile
+1291%
4813
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
192
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
3
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
86.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT2
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 9.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
