HD Graphics 610 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 610 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 610 's Advantages
Lower TDP (5W vs 15W)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1100MHz vs 900MHz)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 610
173
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
+876%
1690
3DMark Time Spy
HD Graphics 610
220
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
+490%
1299
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
96
Shading Units
768
12
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
24
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
10.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
345.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
5W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT1
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
