HD Graphics 620 vs GMA X3500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 620 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 620 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1000MHz
192 additional rendering cores
GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
192
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
3
ROPs
1
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
768.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT2
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 4.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
90 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
