HD Graphics 620 vs UHD Graphics 16EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 620 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 16EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1000MHz vs 750MHz)
64 additional rendering cores
UHD Graphics 16EU 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 620
+100%
384
UHD Graphics 16EU
192
3DMark Time Spy
HD Graphics 620
+10%
337
UHD Graphics 16EU
306
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
HD Graphics 620
+5%
152
UHD Graphics 16EU
144
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
750 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
192
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
3
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
768.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
384.0 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT2
GPU Name
Jasper Lake GT1
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 11.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm++
Process Size
10 nm+
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
