Home Comparison Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i9 10900KF

Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i9 10900KF

Intel Celeron G5905
VS
Intel Core i9 10900KF
Intel Celeron G5905
Intel Core i9 10900KF
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G5905 with 2 cores 3.5GHz and Intel Core i9 10900KF with 10 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G5905 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (58W vs 125W)
Intel Core i9 10900KF 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (2933 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (45.8GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (20MB vs 4MB)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Celeron G5905
872
Intel Core i9 10900KF +57%
1375
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G5905
1695
Intel Core i9 10900KF +711%
13761
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G5905
676
Intel Core i9 10900KF +157%
1741
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G5905
1095
Intel Core i9 10900KF +577%
7414
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron G5905
922
Intel Core i9 10900KF +41%
1301
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G5905
1731
Intel Core i9 10900KF +538%
11050
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron G5905
2193
Intel Core i9 10900KF +42%
3118
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron G5905
2830
Intel Core i9 10900KF +709%
22915
Intel Celeron G5905
VS
Intel Core i9 10900KF

General Parameters

Jul 2020
Release Date
May 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
G5905
Processor Number
i9-10900KF
LGA-1200
Socket
LGA-1200
UHD Graphics 610
Integrated Graphics
N/A

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
58 W
Power Consumption
125 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
10
2
Performance Core Threads
20
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
2
Total Core Count
10
2
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35x
Multiplier
37x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
20 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
128 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
-
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1050 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
96
Shader Units
-
12
Texture Units
-
2
Raster Operation Units
-
12
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
4096x2304 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron G5905
Official Website
Intel Core i9 10900KF
3.0
PCIe Version
3.0
16
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i5 9500T
2
Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265
3
Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i3 4170
4
Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i3 13100F
5
Intel Celeron G5905 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
6
Intel Celeron G5905 vs Intel Core i9 14901E
7
Intel Celeron G5905 vs AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 8300G
8
Intel Celeron G5905 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
9
Intel Celeron G5905 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
10
Intel Celeron G5905 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Related News

1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy