Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

VS

Intel Celeron G6900

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with 4 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 4 months late

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 12nm)

Lower TDP (46W vs 65W)

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 's Advantages

Better graphics card performance

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +36%

1284

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

943

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

2476

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G +32%

3292

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +50%

1666

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

1106

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

2676

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G +13%

3049

Blender

Intel Celeron G6900

22

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G +104%

45

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +46%

1303

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

889

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

2535

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G +19%

3033

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +20%

2674

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

2210

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

4402

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G +62%

7159

Intel Celeron G6900

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

General Parameters

Jan 2022

Release Date

Sep 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Picasso

G6900

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

AM4

UHD Graphics 710

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 8

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.9 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

12 nm

46 W

Power Consumption

45-65 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

4

2

Performance Core Threads

4

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

2

Total Core Count

4

2

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

34x

Multiplier

36x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

4 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

128 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1300 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

128

Shader Units

512

8

Texture Units

32

8

Raster Operation Units

8

16

Execution Units

8

15 W

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

0.36 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

1.13 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron G6900

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

2

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D

3

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 14701TE

4

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

5

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i9 7920X

6

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i5 10600

7

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Loongson LS3A6000

8

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Celeron G3930

9

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i3 12300T

10

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU