Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 13600

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 13600

Intel Celeron J4005
VS
Intel Core i5 13600
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Core i5 13600
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i5 13600 with 14 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Intel Core i5 13600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
361
Intel Core i5 13600 +593%
2502
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
623
Intel Core i5 13600 +2105%
13739
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
440
Intel Core i5 13600 +322%
1859
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
817
Intel Core i5 13600 +1654%
14338
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron J4005
1087
Intel Core i5 13600 +276%
4095
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4005
1578
Intel Core i5 13600 +1920%
31879
Intel Celeron J4005
VS
Intel Core i5 13600

General Parameters

Dec 2017
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
J4005
Processor Number
i5-13600
BGA-1090
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
154 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
6
2
Performance Core Threads
12
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
2
Total Core Count
14
2
Total Thread Count
20
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
-
Multiplier
27x
48 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
4 MB per core
L2 Cache
1280 K per core
-
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
8 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
35.76 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
-

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1500 MHz
96
Shader Units
256
12
Texture Units
16
2
Raster Operation Units
8
12
Execution Units
32
5 W
Power Consumption
15 W
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4005
Official Website
Intel Core i5 13600
2.0
PCIe Version
5.0
6
PCIe Lanes
20
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 10400F
2
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL
3
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i9 12900KF
4
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 9400F
5
Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
6
Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
7
Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
8
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 12400
9
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i7 7700T
10
Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 12400T

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy