Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

VS

Intel Celeron J4025

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X with 32 cores 4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 350W)

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (166.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (4GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025

395

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X +644%

2942

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

675

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X +3676%

25488

Intel Celeron J4025

VS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Oct 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

Storm Peak

J4025

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

AMD Socket sTR5

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

N/A

-

Generation

Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 4 (Storm Peak))

Package

-

Transistor Count

26.28 billions

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

10 W

Power Consumption

350 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Foundry

TSMC

-

Die Size

4x71 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

6 nm

-

I/O Die Size

388 mm²

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

-

2

Performance Core Threads

-

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4 GHz

2.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.3 GHz

2

Total Core Count

32

2

Total Thread Count

64

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

40.0

32 K per core

L1 Cache

64 KB per core

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

32 MB

-

L3 Cache

128 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

1 TB

2

Max Memory Channels

4

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

166.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025

Official Website

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

2.0

PCIe Version

5

6

PCIe Lanes

88

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 14700KF

2

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100

3

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Apple M1 Ultra

4

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE

5

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 11700F

6

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 11900K

7

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 8600G

8

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 10600K

9

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Pentium J3710

10

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i3 10300

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU