Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron 7305

VS

Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Celeron 7305

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N4020 with 2 cores 1.1GHz and Intel Celeron 7305 with 5 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N4020 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 15W)

Intel Celeron 7305 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 2 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N4020

368

Intel Celeron 7305 +48%

546

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N4020

582

Intel Celeron 7305 +114%

1248

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron N4020 +8%

464

Intel Celeron 7305

426

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N4020

850

Intel Celeron 7305 +45%

1240

Intel Celeron N4020

VS

Intel Celeron 7305

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Jan 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

Alder Lake

N4020

Processor Number

7305

BGA-1090

Socket

BGA-1744

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics (48 EU)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

6 W

Power Consumption

12-15 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

55 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

1

2

Performance Core Threads

1

1.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.1 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

4

-

Efficiency Core Threads

4

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

0.9 GHz

2

Total Core Count

5

2

Total Thread Count

5

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

11x

32 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

1280 K per core

-

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

8 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

650 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1100 MHz

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N4020

Official Website

Intel Celeron 7305

2.0

PCIe Version

4.0

6

PCIe Lanes

20

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i5 9400H

2

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i5 1035G1

3

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core 7 250H

4

Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD Ryzen Z1

5

Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

6

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i3 1210U

7

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron 4205U

8

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i7 1060NG7

9

Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Core i3 1110G4

10

Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU