Home Comparison Intel Celeron N5095 vs Apple M4 Ultra

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Apple M4 Ultra

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Apple M4 Ultra with 32 cores 4.52GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Apple M4 Ultra 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 2933)
Higher base frequency (4.52GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Celeron N5095
609
Apple M4 Ultra +261%
2199
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N5095
2174
Apple M4 Ultra +1958%
44742
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron N5095
503
Apple M4 Ultra +708%
4065
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N5095
1449
Apple M4 Ultra +2169%
32892
VS

General Parameters

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2025
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Jasper Lake
Core Architecture
Apple M4
N5095
Processor Number
-
BGA-1338
Socket
Apple M-Socket
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Integrated Graphics
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
-
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

4
Performance Cores
24
4
Performance Core Threads
24
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.52 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.89 GHz
4
Total Core Count
32
4
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
20x
Multiplier
45
384 K per core
L2 Cache
-
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-8533
16 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
45.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
256
Shader Units
10240
16
Texture Units
640
8
Raster Operation Units
320
16
Execution Units
1280
6 W
Power Consumption
120
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
36.9 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
3.0
PCIe Version
-
8
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy