Intel Core 3 100UL vs Apple M4 Max 16 Core
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 3 100UL with 6 cores 1.2GHz and Apple M4 Max 16 Core with 16 cores 4.52GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core 3 100UL 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 70W)
Apple M4 Max 16 Core 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 5200)
Larger memory bandwidth (546GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.52GHz vs 1.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Score
General Parameters
Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Raptor Lake-PS
Core Architecture
Apple M4
100U
Processor Number
-
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
Apple M-Socket
UHD Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Generation
-
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
70 W
55 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
-
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
12
4
Performance Core Threads
12
1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.52 GHz
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
4
Efficiency Cores
4
4
Efficiency Core Threads
4
900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.59 GHz
3.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
6
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
12.0
Multiplier
45
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
-
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
-
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-8533
96 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
-
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
546 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
512
Shader Units
5120
32
Texture Units
320
16
Raster Operation Units
160
64
Execution Units
640
15 W
Power Consumption
62
1.21 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
18.4 TFLOPS
