Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Processor U301L
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 5 210H with 8 cores 2.2GHz and Intel Processor U301L with 5 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core 5 210H 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Integrated graphics card
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 8MB)
Intel Processor U301L 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 5200)
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Score
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Raptor Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS
210H
Processor Number
-
BGA-1744
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 64EU
Core 5(Raptor Lake-H Refresh)
Generation
Intel Processor (Raptor Lake)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
35-45 W
Power Consumption
15 W
115 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
1
8
Performance Core Threads
2
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
4
4
Efficiency Core Threads
4
1.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
900 MHz
3.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
1600 MHz
8
Total Core Count
5
12
Total Thread Count
6
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
22
Multiplier
12.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5200,DDR4-3200,LPDDR5-5200,LPDDR5x-5200,LPDDR4x-4267
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
96 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
400 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1400 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
384
Shader Units
-
24
Texture Units
-
12
Raster Operation Units
-
48
Execution Units
-
15
Power Consumption
-
1.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
