Home Comparison Intel Core 7 160HL vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel Core 7 160HL vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core 7 160HL with 14 cores 2.5GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT with 12 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core 7 160HL 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 3200)
Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 47.68GB/s)
Lower TDP (45W vs 105W)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jul 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake-PS
Core Architecture
Zen 2 (Matisse)
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
AM4
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Integrated Graphics
No
Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Generation
-

Package

-
Transistor Count
3.8 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
45 W
Power Consumption
105 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

6
Performance Cores
12
12
Performance Core Threads
24
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
8
Efficiency Cores
-
8
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
14
Total Core Count
12
20
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
38x
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
96 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
47.68 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
4.0
8
PCIe Lanes
24

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy