Home Comparison Intel Core i3 10320 vs Intel Core i9 13900KS

Intel Core i3 10320 vs Intel Core i9 13900KS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i3 10320 with 4 cores 3.8GHz and Intel Core i9 13900KS with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i3 10320 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 3.2GHz)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Intel Core i9 13900KS 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i3 10320
1268
Intel Core i9 13900KS +82%
2317
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 10320
6347
Intel Core i9 13900KS +543%
40837
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i3 10320
1532
Intel Core i9 13900KS +115%
3294
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 10320
5173
Intel Core i9 13900KS +340%
22794
Blender
Intel Core i3 10320
76
Intel Core i9 13900KS +635%
559
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i3 10320
1225
Intel Core i9 13900KS +83%
2242
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 10320
4640
Intel Core i9 13900KS +471%
26528
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i3 10320
2834
Intel Core i9 13900KS +67%
4759
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i3 10320
10004
Intel Core i9 13900KS +517%
61817
VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
i3-10320
Processor Number
i9-13900KS
LGA-1200
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

4
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
16
-
Efficiency Core Threads
16
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
24
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
38x
Multiplier
32x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
32 MB shared
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1150 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
192
Shader Units
256
24
Texture Units
16
3
Raster Operation Units
8
24
Execution Units
32
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.38 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

3.0
PCIe Version
5.0
16
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy