Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i7 8559U

VS

Intel Core i3 1305U

Intel Core i7 8559U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i3 1305U with 5 cores 1.6GHz and Intel Core i7 8559U with 4 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i3 1305U 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Larger L3 cache size (10MB vs 8MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (15W vs 28W)

Intel Core i7 8559U 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 1.6GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i3 1305U +27%

1803

Intel Core i7 8559U

1416

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i3 1305U

3566

Intel Core i7 8559U +36%

4869

Blender

Intel Core i3 1305U

26

Intel Core i7 8559U +165%

69

Intel Core i3 1305U

VS

Intel Core i7 8559U

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Apr 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Raptor Lake

Core Architecture

Kaby Lake-R

i3-1305U

Processor Number

-

BGA-1744

Socket

Intel BGA 1356

UHD Graphics (64EU)

Integrated Graphics

Iris Pro Plus

-

Generation

Core i7 (Kaby Lake-U Refresh)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

12-15 W

Power Consumption

28 W

55 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

72 °C

-

Foundry

Intel

-

Die Size

123 mm²

CPU Performance

1

Performance Cores

-

2

Performance Core Threads

-

1.6 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.7 GHz

4.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

5

Total Core Count

4

6

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

16x

Multiplier

27.0

80 K per core

L1 Cache

64 KB per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

256 KB per core

10 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR5x-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133

64 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1250 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

512

Shader Units

-

32

Texture Units

-

16

Raster Operation Units

-

64

Execution Units

-

45 W

Power Consumption

-

1.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i3 1305U

Official Website

Intel Core i7 8559U

4.0

PCIe Version

-

20

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i3 1305U vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

2

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i7 11600H

3

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i5 13600H

4

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030

5

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i5 8365U

6

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i5 1155G7

7

Intel Core i3 1305U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7435H

8

Intel Core i3 1305U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

9

Intel Core i3 1305U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

10

Intel Core i3 1305U vs Intel Core i7 1180G7

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster