Intel Core i3 13100T vs Intel Celeron G6900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i3 13100T with 4 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i3 13100T 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 4MB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 46W)
Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i3 13100T
+1%
1683
Intel Celeron G6900
1666
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i3 13100T
+75%
4709
Intel Celeron G6900
2676
Blender
Intel Core i3 13100T
+290%
86
Intel Celeron G6900
22
General Parameters
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake
Core Architecture
Alder Lake
i3-13100T
Processor Number
G6900
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 730
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 710
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
46 W
69 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
2
8
Performance Core Threads
2
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
4
Total Core Count
2
8
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25
Multiplier
34x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
5 MB
L2 Cache
1280 K per core
12 MB
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1500 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1300 MHz
192
Shader Units
128
48
Texture Units
8
24
Raster Operation Units
8
24
Execution Units
16
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
3840x2160 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.36 TFLOPS
