Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Celeron 7305

VS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i5 1240P with 12 cores 1.7GHz and Intel Celeron 7305 with 5 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 1240P 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (1.7GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 8MB)

Intel Celeron 7305 's Advantages

Lower TDP (12W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 1240P +280%

2079

Intel Celeron 7305

546

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 1240P +553%

8155

Intel Celeron 7305

1248

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i5 1240P +271%

1583

Intel Celeron 7305

426

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 1240P +533%

7859

Intel Celeron 7305

1240

Intel Core i5 1240P

VS

Intel Celeron 7305

General Parameters

Feb 2022

Release Date

Jan 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake-P

Core Architecture

Alder Lake

i5-1240P

Processor Number

7305

BGA-1744

Socket

BGA-1744

Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics (48 EU)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

BGA-1744

Socket

BGA-1744

28 W

Power Consumption

12-15 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

55 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

1

-

Performance Core Threads

1

1.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.1 GHz

4.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

8

Efficiency Cores

4

-

Efficiency Core Threads

4

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

0.9 GHz

12

Total Core Count

5

16

Total Thread Count

5

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

17x

Multiplier

11x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

1280 K per core

12 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

64 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1300 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1100 MHz

640

Shader Units

-

40

Texture Units

-

20

Raster Operation Units

-

80

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

1.41 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 1240P

Official Website

Intel Celeron 7305

4.0

PCIe Version

4.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs Intel Core i5 1240P

2

Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Core i5 1335U

3

Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

4

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U vs Intel Core i5 1240P

5

Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Core i5 1235U

6

Intel Core i5 1340P vs Intel Core i5 1240P

7

Intel Core i5 13500H vs Intel Core i5 1240P

8

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Processor N100

9

Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Core i5 12450H

10

Intel Core i5 1240P vs Intel Core i7 7500U

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD