Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Pentium 1403 V2

VS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 12600KF with 10 cores 3.7GHz and Pentium 1403 V2 with 2 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 12600KF 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR3-1600)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3)

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.6GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (20MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 22nm)

Pentium 1403 V2 's Advantages

Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 12600KF +420%

2597

Pentium 1403 V2

499

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 12600KF +1345%

12937

Pentium 1403 V2

895

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i5 12600KF +226%

1839

Pentium 1403 V2

564

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 12600KF +1012%

11626

Pentium 1403 V2

1045

Intel Core i5 12600KF

VS

Pentium 1403 V2

General Parameters

Oct 2021

Release Date

Jan 2014

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Ivy Bridge-EN

i5-12600KF

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

Intel Socket 1356

No

Integrated Graphics

N/A

-

Generation

Pentium (Ivy Bridge)

Package

-

Transistor Count

1.008 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

22 nm

LGA-1700

Socket

Intel Socket 1356

125 W

Power Consumption

80 W

150 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

80 °C

-

Foundry

Intel

-

Die Size

133 mm²

-

Package

FC-LGA12A

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

-

12

Performance Core Threads

-

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.6 GHz

4.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

0

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2.8 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

10

Total Core Count

2

16

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37x

Multiplier

26.0

80 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

9728 K shared

L2 Cache

256 K per core

20 MB shared

L3 Cache

6 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR3-1600

128 GB

Max Memory Size

-

2

Max Memory Channels

3

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 12600KF

Official Website

-

5.0

PCIe Version

3

20

PCIe Lanes

24

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Core i5 13400F

2

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F vs Intel Core i5 12600KF

3

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Core i5 12600K

4

Intel Core i5 12400F vs Intel Core i5 12600KF

5

Intel Core i5 14400F vs Intel Core i5 12600KF

6

Intel Core i5 14500 vs Intel Core i5 12600KF

7

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Core i3 9350KF

8

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Pentium 1403 V2

9

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Core i7 7700T

10

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Core i7 6700

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD