Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Core i5 14600T

VS

Intel Core i5 8500T

Intel Core i5 14600T

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8500T with 6 cores 2.1GHz and Intel Core i5 14600T with 14 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 8500T 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.8GHz)

Intel Core i5 14600T 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 9MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 8500T

1178

Intel Core i5 14600T +140%

2830

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 8500T

4130

Intel Core i5 14600T +271%

15337

Intel Core i5 8500T

VS

Intel Core i5 14600T

General Parameters

Apr 2018

Release Date

Jan 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Coffee Lake

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake-R

i5-8500T

Processor Number

-

LGA-1151

Socket

Intel Socket 1700

UHD Graphics 630

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 770

-

Generation

Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

35 W

Power Consumption

35 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Foundry

Intel

-

Die Size

257 mm²

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

6

Performance Core Threads

12

2.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.8 GHz

3.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.1 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

8

-

Efficiency Core Threads

8

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2000 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.6 GHz

6

Total Core Count

14

6

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

21x

Multiplier

18.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

80 KB per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

9 MB shared

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600

128 GB

Max Memory Size

-

2

Max Memory Channels

2

41.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

89.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

350 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1100 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

3

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.38 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 8500T

Official Website

Intel Core i5 14600T

3.0

PCIe Version

5

16

PCIe Lanes

16

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 8500T vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

2

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Core i7 14700T

3

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Celeron J3455E

4

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Pentium Gold G6600

5

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Core i5 10400F

6

Intel Core i5 8500T vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

7

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Apple M1 Ultra

8

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Core i3 8350K

9

Intel Core i5 8500T vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

10

Intel Core i5 8500T vs Intel Core i9 12900F

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster