Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core i3 5005U

VS

Intel Core i7 1160G7

Intel Core i3 5005U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i7 1160G7 with 4 cores 0.9GHz and Intel Core i3 5005U with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i7 1160G7 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 8 months late

Higher specification of memory (4267 vs 1600)

Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 3MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +174%

1787

Intel Core i3 5005U

652

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +119%

2848

Intel Core i3 5005U

1295

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +169%

1309

Intel Core i3 5005U

486

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +297%

4320

Intel Core i3 5005U

1087

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +130%

2639

Intel Core i3 5005U

1145

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Core i7 1160G7 +354%

9168

Intel Core i3 5005U

2017

Intel Core i7 1160G7

VS

Intel Core i3 5005U

General Parameters

Sep 2020

Release Date

Jan 2015

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Tiger Lake UP4

Core Architecture

Broadwell

i7-1160G7

Processor Number

i3-5005U

BGA-1598

Socket

BGA-1168

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Integrated Graphics

HD Graphics 5500

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

7-15 W

Power Consumption

15 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

4

0.9-2.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

4.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

4

Total Core Count

2

8

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

9-21x

Multiplier

20x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

12 MB shared

L3 Cache

3 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR4x-4267

Memory Types

DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1600

32 GB

Max Memory Size

16 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

51.2 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

25.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1100 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

850 MHz

768

Shader Units

-

48

Texture Units

-

24

Raster Operation Units

-

96

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

1.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i7 1160G7

Official Website

Intel Core i3 5005U

4.0

PCIe Version

2.0

16

PCIe Lanes

12

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core 5 120U

2

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core i7 8569U

3

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

4

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

5

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core i7 12800HX

6

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

7

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core i9 11950H

8

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Pentium Silver N5030

9

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

10

Intel Core i7 1160G7 vs Intel Core i5 1245U

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster