Intel Core i7 14701E vs Intel Core i5 13600
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i7 14701E with 8 cores 2.6GHz and Intel Core i5 13600 with 14 cores 2.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i7 14701E 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Larger L3 cache size (33MB vs 24MB)
Intel Core i5 13600 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 5600)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.6GHz)
Score
General Parameters
Jul 2024
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake-R
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
-
Processor Number
i5-13600
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Generation
-
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
154 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
-
257 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
6
-
Performance Core Threads
12
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
14
16
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
27x
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
1280 K per core
33 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
-
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
-
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1500 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS
