Intel Core i7 6785R vs Intel Core i7 10700
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i7 6785R with 4 cores 3.3GHz and Intel Core i7 10700 with 8 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i7 6785R 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 2.9GHz)
Intel Core i7 10700 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Higher specification of memory (2933 vs 2133)
Larger memory bandwidth (45.8GB/s vs 34.1GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i7 6785R
718
Intel Core i7 10700
+53%
1101
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i7 6785R
2101
Intel Core i7 10700
+17%
2467
General Parameters
May 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Skylake
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
-
Processor Number
i7-10700
Intel BGA 1440
Socket
LGA-1200
Iris Pro 580
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7(Skylake-R)
Generation
-
Package
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
-
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
3.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
29x
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR3, DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
64
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
34.1 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1150 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Shader Units
192
-
Texture Units
24
-
Raster Operation Units
3
-
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
-
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS
