Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

VS

Intel Core i7 8565U

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i7 8565U with 4 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 134U with 12 cores 0.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i7 8565U 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (1.8GHz vs 0.7GHz)

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 4 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 8MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (9W vs 15W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i7 8565U

1249

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U +71%

2146

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i7 8565U

3461

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U +146%

8540

Intel Core i7 8565U

VS

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

General Parameters

Aug 2018

Release Date

Dec 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Whiskey Lake

Core Architecture

Meteor Lake

i7-8565U

Processor Number

-

BGA-1528

Socket

Intel BGA 2551

UHD Graphics 620

Integrated Graphics

Arc Xe-LPG 64EU

-

Generation

Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

15 W

Power Consumption

9 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

4

1.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

0.7 GHz

4.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

10

-

Efficiency Core Threads

10

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

500 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

3.6 GHz

4

Total Core Count

12

8

Total Thread Count

14

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

18x

Multiplier

7.0

64 K per core

L1 Cache

112 KB per core

256 K per core

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

8 MB shared

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133

Memory Types

LPDDR5-6400

64 GB

Max Memory Size

-

2

Max Memory Channels

2

37.5 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1150 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

3

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.38 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i7 8565U

Official Website

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

3.0

PCIe Version

4

16

PCIe Lanes

8

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i7 8565U vs AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

2

Intel Core i7 8565U vs AMD Ryzen 3 5400U

3

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core i7 11600H

4

Intel Core i7 8565U vs AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS

5

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core i7 10710U

6

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core i7 10610U

7

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core i7 8750H

8

Intel Core i7 8565U vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

9

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core 3 100U

10

Intel Core i7 8565U vs Intel Core i5 13450HX

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster