Home Comparison Intel Core i9 10900F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240

Intel Core i9 10900F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 10900F with 10 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2020
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
i9-10900F
Processor Number
-
LGA-1200
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
N/A
Integrated Graphics
-
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
-
Foundry
Intel

CPU Performance

10
Performance Cores
6
20
Performance Core Threads
6
2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
4
-
Efficiency Core Threads
4
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
10
Total Core Count
10
20
Total Thread Count
10
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
28x
Multiplier
32
64 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
23 MB
20 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
128 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
45.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
3.0
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy