Home Comparison Intel Core i9 11900 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Core i9 11900 vs Intel Celeron J1900

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 11900 with 8 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 11900 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (50GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 11900 +1075%
2152
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 11900 +831%
5320
Intel Celeron J1900
571
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Rocket Lake
Core Architecture
Bay Trail
i9-11900
Processor Number
J1900
LGA-1200
Socket
FCBGA1170
UHD Graphics 750
Integrated Graphics
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
10 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
4
16
Performance Core Threads
4
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.42 GHz
8
Total Core Count
4
16
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
25x
Multiplier
20x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3L-1333
128 GB
Max Memory Size
8 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
50 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
21.3 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
688 MHz
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
854 MHz
256
Shader Units
-
64
Texture Units
-
32
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.04 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

4.0
PCIe Version
2.0
20
PCIe Lanes
4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy