Home Comparison Intel Core i9 12900K vs Intel Core i5 10600

Intel Core i9 12900K vs Intel Core i5 10600

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 12900K with 16 cores 32GHz and Intel Core i5 10600 with 6 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 12900K 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (32GHz vs 3.3GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i5 10600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +59%
2028
Intel Core i5 10600
1272
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +207%
27422
Intel Core i5 10600
8925
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +68%
2631
Intel Core i5 10600
1562
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +164%
17004
Intel Core i5 10600
6422
Blender
Intel Core i9 12900K +210%
422
Intel Core i5 10600
136
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +69%
1970
Intel Core i5 10600
1159
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +165%
17028
Intel Core i5 10600
6409
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +44%
4173
Intel Core i5 10600
2896
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +203%
41390
Intel Core i5 10600
13623
VS

General Parameters

Oct 2021
Release Date
May 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
i9-12900K
Processor Number
i5-10600
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1200
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
12
3,2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
5.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
8
Efficiency Cores
-
8
Efficiency Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
3.9 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
16
Total Core Count
6
24
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32x
Multiplier
33x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
14 MB shared
L2 Cache
256 K per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
128 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1550 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
256
Shader Units
192
16
Texture Units
24
8
Raster Operation Units
3
32
Execution Units
24
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

5.0
PCIe Version
3.0
20
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy