Home Comparison Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i9 13900KS

Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i9 13900KS

Intel Core i9 14900F
VS
Intel Core i9 13900KS
Intel Core i9 14900F
Intel Core i9 13900KS
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 14900F with 24 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i9 13900KS with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 14900F 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Intel Core i9 13900KS 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
2238
Intel Core i9 13900KS +3%
2317
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
35220
Intel Core i9 13900KS +15%
40837
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
3279
Intel Core i9 13900KS
3294
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
19868
Intel Core i9 13900KS +14%
22794
Blender
Intel Core i9 14900F
489
Intel Core i9 13900KS +14%
559
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
4644
Intel Core i9 13900KS +2%
4759
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i9 14900F
53444
Intel Core i9 13900KS +15%
61817
Intel Core i9 14900F
VS
Intel Core i9 13900KS

General Parameters

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
i9-14900F
Processor Number
i9-13900KS
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1700
No
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
150 W
219 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
16
Performance Core Threads
16
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
16
16
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
24
Total Core Count
24
32
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
32x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
32 MB shared
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i9 14900F
Official Website
Intel Core i9 13900KS
5.0
PCIe Version
5.0
20
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135UL
2
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Celeron J4005
3
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i5 8400
4
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i5 7400
5
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i7 10700T
6
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i9 12900E
7
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i5 12400
8
Intel Core i9 14900F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
9
Intel Core i9 14900F vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
10
Intel Core i9 14900F vs Intel Core i5 8500T

Related News

1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy