Intel Core i9 7960X vs Intel Celeron J4025

VS

Intel Core i9 7960X

Intel Celeron J4025

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 7960X with 16 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 7960X 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (79.47GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 2 months late

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +232%

1313

Intel Celeron J4025

395

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +1243%

9066

Intel Celeron J4025

675

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +133%

1111

Intel Celeron J4025

476

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +1441%

13687

Intel Celeron J4025

888

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +103%

2489

Intel Celeron J4025

1224

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Core i9 7960X +1479%

26917

Intel Celeron J4025

1704

Intel Core i9 7960X

VS

Intel Celeron J4025

General Parameters

Sep 2017

Release Date

Nov 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Skylake

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake Refresh

i9-7960X

Processor Number

J4025

LGA-2066

Socket

BGA-1090

N/A

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

165 W

Power Consumption

10 W

98 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

16

Performance Cores

2

32

Performance Core Threads

2

2.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

4.2 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

2.9 GHz

16

Total Core Count

2

32

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

28x

Multiplier

20x

64 K per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

4 MB shared

22 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

128 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

4

Max Memory Channels

2

79.47 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

38.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

700 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i9 7960X

Official Website

Intel Celeron J4025

3.0

PCIe Version

2.0

44

PCIe Lanes

6

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

2

Intel Core i9 7960X vs Intel Pentium J3710

3

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

4

Intel Core i9 7960X vs Intel Core i5 13600

5

Intel Core i9 7960X vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL

6

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700G

7

Intel Core i9 7960X vs Intel Core i9 13900KS

8

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE

9

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

10

Intel Core i9 7960X vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster