Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 8600K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Intel Core i5 8600K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i5 8600K with 6 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 3 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 9MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)

Intel Core i5 8600K 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.4GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

VS

Intel Core i5 8600K

General Parameters

Jan 2025

Release Date

Oct 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

i5-8600K

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

17.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

95 W

105°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

243 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

6

16

Performance Core Threads

6

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.3 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

6

20

Total Thread Count

6

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24.0

Multiplier

36x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

9 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2666

256 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

41.6 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1150 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i5 8600K

5

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 9900X

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 10900T

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 9600

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 13700KF

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3955WX

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 9800X

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i3 7100

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU