Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 10900T

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Intel Core i9 10900T

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i9 10900T with 10 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 8 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.9GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 20MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i9 10900T 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

VS

Intel Core i9 10900T

General Parameters

Jan 2025

Release Date

May 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Comet Lake

-

Processor Number

i9-10900T

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1200

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

17.8 billions

Transistor Count

-

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

35 W

105°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

243 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

10

16

Performance Core Threads

20

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.9 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.6 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

10

20

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24.0

Multiplier

19x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

20 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

256 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

45.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i9 10900T

5

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 13700KF

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 11900F

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Pentium G4400

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 12700TE

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 8600K

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game