Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 13900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 13900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265
VS
Intel Core i9 13900
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Core i9 13900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i9 13900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i9 13900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 5600)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 30MB)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265
VS
Intel Core i9 13900

General Parameters

Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
-
Processor Number
i9-13900
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
219 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
-
243 mm²
Die Size
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
16
Performance Core Threads
16
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
16
12
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
20
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
20x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i9 13900
5
PCIe Version
5.0
20
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 12900
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i3 13100E
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5600
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 14501TE
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Pentium Gold G6500

Related News

1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy