Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 14900K

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i9 14900K

Intel Core Ultra 7 265
VS
Intel Core i9 14900K
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Core i9 14900K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i9 14900K with 24 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
Intel Core i9 14900K 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 5600)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 30MB)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265
VS
Intel Core i9 14900K

General Parameters

Jan 2025
Release Date
Oct 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
-
Processor Number
i9-14900K
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)
Generation
Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Package

17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
16
Performance Core Threads
16
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
16
12
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
20
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
32x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i9 14900K
5
PCIe Version
5.0
20
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i3 9300T
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 10400F
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 14701TE
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 6400
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 12500
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 14700K
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 6700

Related News

1
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
2
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
3
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
4
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
5
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
6
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
7
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
8
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
9
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
10
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy