Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 14100

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Core i3 14100

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i3 14100 with 4 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 12MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Intel Core i3 14100 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)

Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Core i3 14100

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Jan 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

i3-14100

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1700

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 730

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

60 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

110 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

8

Performance Core Threads

8

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.5 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.7 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

4

20

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

35x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

256 GB

Max Memory Size

192 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1500 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

48

-

Raster Operation Units

24

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.35 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i3 14100

5

PCIe Version

5.0

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium G4620

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 7100T

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 9500

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium Gold G7400

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron G5900T

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 12500E

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5600X3D

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU