Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 10850K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Core i9 10850K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i9 10850K with 10 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 5 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 20MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Intel Core i9 10850K 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Core i9 10850K

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Jul 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Comet Lake-S

-

Processor Number

i9-10850K

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1200

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

125 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

10

8

Performance Core Threads

20

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.2 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

10

20

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

36x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

256 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

20 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

256 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

45.8 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

-

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i9 10850K

5

PCIe Version

3.0

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 12500T

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 14900KS

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 10700KF

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11500

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 8086K

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core 7 150HL

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 9900

Related News

1

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

2

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

3

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

4

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

5

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

6

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

7

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

8

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

9

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

10

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip