Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 10900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 10900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 10900
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Intel Core i9 10900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i9 10900 with 10 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i9 10900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 10900

General Parameters

Dec 2024
Release Date
May 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
-
Processor Number
i9-10900
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1200
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
-

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
10
8
Performance Core Threads
20
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
-
12
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
20
Total Core Count
10
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15
Multiplier
28x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
256 K per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
20 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
256 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
-
Shader Units
192
-
Texture Units
24
-
Raster Operation Units
3
-
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
-
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i9 10900
5
PCIe Version
3.0
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155UL
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron J3455E
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 10700KF
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 12900F
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 14600K
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11600K
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8600K
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 6850K

Related News

1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy