Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 14900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 14900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 14900
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Intel Core i9 14900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i9 14900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Intel Core i9 14900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 14900

General Parameters

Dec 2024
Release Date
Jan 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
-
Processor Number
i9-14900
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
-

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
219 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
16
12
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
20
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15
Multiplier
20x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i9 14900
5
PCIe Version
5.0
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core 5 130HL
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i3 12300
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 11900K
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 9900
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 8500G
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8600
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 9900KF

Related News

1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy