Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i3 13100F

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Intel Core i3 13100F

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with 20 cores 3.9GHz and Intel Core i3 13100F with 4 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 12MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Intel Core i3 13100F 's Advantages

Lower TDP (58W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +33%

2308

Intel Core i3 13100F

1726

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +322%

37273

Intel Core i3 13100F

8814

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +49%

3208

Intel Core i3 13100F

2140

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +201%

21797

Intel Core i3 13100F

7235

Blender

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF +338%

460

Intel Core i3 13100F

105

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

VS

Intel Core i3 13100F

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Jan 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Raptor Lake

265KF

Processor Number

i3-13100F

FCLGA-1851

Socket

LGA-1700

No

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

58 W

250 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

89 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

TSMC

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

8

Performance Core Threads

8

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

3.3 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

4

20

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

39

Multiplier

34x

112 K per core

L1 Cache

80 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

1280 K per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

12 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

192 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Official Website

Intel Core i3 13100F

5.0

PCIe Version

5.0

24

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i7 12700TE

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i3 8350K

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i9 9960X

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Celeron G5905

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Loongson LS3A6000

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i5 12600

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i5 7600K

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i9 7980XE

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core i9 7900X

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU