Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 24MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
+5%
3147
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2991
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
10250
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
+93%
19830
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
-
Processor Number
265
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
FCLGA-1851
Integrated Graphics
Arc Graphics
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Package
-
Transistor Count
17.8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
182 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
243 mm²
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
8
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
12
12
Efficiency Core Threads
12
1.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
20
Total Core Count
20
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24
Multiplier
24
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1950 MHz
