Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G with 8 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 3 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3200)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 8MB)

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Jul 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Zen 2

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

AM4

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 8

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.9 billions

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

45-65 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

8

16

Performance Core Threads

16

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

5.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

16

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1900 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

8

24

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

36x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

36 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1800 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2100 MHz

512

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

4

Execution Units

8

-

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

1.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

1.13 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G

5

PCIe Version

3.0

16

PCIe Lanes

12

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 14901KE

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 12100E

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 6900K

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 13500T

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700G

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 12400F

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 10700T

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 8300

Related News

1

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

2

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

3

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

4

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

5

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

6

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

7

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

8

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

9

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

10

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip