Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Celeron J4125

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Celeron J4125

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Celeron J4125 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 11 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron J4125 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

VS

Intel Celeron J4125

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Nov 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

J4125

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

BGA-1090

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

10 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

16

Performance Core Threads

4

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

5.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1900 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

4

24

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

25.0

Multiplier

20x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

4 MB shared

36 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

38.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

1800 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

750 MHz

512

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

4

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

1.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Celeron J4125

5

PCIe Version

2.0

16

PCIe Lanes

6

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 13700T

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5425U

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 9350KF

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 9300T

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 10600KF

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 12500TE

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 12300

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 12500E

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Related News

1

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

2

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

3

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

4

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

5

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

6

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

7

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

8

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

9

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

10

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip