Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 8350K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Core i3 8350K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Core i3 8350K with 4 cores 4.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages

Released 7 years late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 8MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i3 8350K 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (4.0GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Lower TDP (91W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

VS

Intel Core i3 8350K

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

Oct 2017

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

-

Processor Number

i3-8350K

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1151

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

91 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

16

Performance Core Threads

4

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.0 GHz

5.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1900 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

4

24

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

40x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

36 MB shared

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

1800 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1150 MHz

512

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

4

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

1.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i3 8350K

5

PCIe Version

3.0

16

PCIe Lanes

16

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 3 5425U

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 13100T

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 12500E

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 7740X

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Processor 300

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 14900F

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL

Related News

1

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

2

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

3

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

4

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

5

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

6

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

7

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

8

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

9

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

10

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip