Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 10700K

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Intel Core i7 10700K

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Core i7 10700K with 8 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 5 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 16MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Intel Core i7 10700K 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.5GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

VS

Intel Core i7 10700K

General Parameters

Oct 2024

Release Date

May 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Comet Lake-S

-

Processor Number

i7-10700K

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

LGA-1200

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

125 W

Power Consumption

125 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

8

16

Performance Core Threads

16

2.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.8 GHz

5.6 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.1 GHz

16

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1900 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

24

Total Core Count

8

24

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

25.0

Multiplier

38x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

36 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

256 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

45.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

600 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

1800 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

512

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

24

-

Raster Operation Units

3

4

Execution Units

24

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

1.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Core i7 10700K

5

PCIe Version

3.0

16

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 9700T

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5420

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 14901E

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 10900KF

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Pentium 350

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 9700KF

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Related News

1

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

2

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

3

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

4

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

5

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

6

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

7

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

8

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

9

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

10

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage