Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 8700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 8700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Intel Core i7 8700
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel Core i7 8700
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Core i7 8700 with 6 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i7 8700 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285
VS
Intel Core i7 8700

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Oct 2017
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake
-
Processor Number
i7-8700
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1151
Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
-

Package

7 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
16
Performance Core Threads
12
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1900 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
6
24
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
32x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
256 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
600 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1800 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1200 MHz
512
Shader Units
192
-
Texture Units
24
-
Raster Operation Units
3
4
Execution Units
24
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Resolution
4096x2304 - 60 Hz
1.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.38 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i7 8700
5
PCIe Version
3.0
16
PCIe Lanes
16
-
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 9800X
2
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i9 9900KF
3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i5 14600KF
4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
5
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Pentium 1403 V2
7
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i3 10105F
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core i7 6700T
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
10
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Related News

1
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
2
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
3
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
4
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
5
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
6
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
7
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
8
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
9
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
10
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy