Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Processor 300

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Processor 300 with 2 cores 3.9GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Processor 300 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (46W vs 65W)

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 2 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 5.0)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Score

Intel Processor 300

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

General Parameters

Oct 2023

Release Date

Dec 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Arrow Lake-S

300

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

Intel Socket 1851

UHD Graphics 730

Integrated Graphics

-

Generation

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

3 nm

46 W

Power Consumption

65 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

-

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

8

4

Performance Core Threads

8

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.5 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.3 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

12

-

Efficiency Core Threads

12

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1.2 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

2

Total Core Count

20

4

Total Thread Count

20

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

39x

Multiplier

15

80 K per core

L1 Cache

112 KB per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

23 MB

6 MB shared

L3 Cache

24 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR5-6400

128 GB

Max Memory Size

256 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1400 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

48

Texture Units

-

24

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

5.0

PCIe Version

5

20

PCIe Lanes

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core 5 130HL

2

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i5 6600

3

Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

4

Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

5

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i9 9940X

6

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Celeron J4125

7

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i5 9500

8

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Pentium G4560

9

Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

10

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i3 14100F

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU