Home Comparison Intel Processor N200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100

Intel Processor N200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100

Intel Processor N200
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100
Intel Processor N200
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100)
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Processor N200 with 4 cores 1.8GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 with 8 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Processor N200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (6W vs 23W)
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 6MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Processor N200
924
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 +60%
1481
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Processor N200
2988
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 +259%
10740
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Processor N200
1262
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 +88%
2385
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Processor N200
2701
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100 +325%
11494
Intel Processor N200
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100

General Parameters

Jan 2023
Release Date
Sep 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Qualcomm
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Snapdragon X
N200
Processor Number
X1E-42-100
BGA-1264
Socket
Custom
UHD Graphics (32 EU)
Integrated Graphics
Qualcomm Adreno X1

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
6 W
Power Consumption
23 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
8
-
Performance Core Threads
8
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
-
4
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
3.7 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
4
Total Core Count
8
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
37x
Multiplier
32x
96 K per core
L1 Cache
-
2 MB shared
L2 Cache
-
6 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-8448
16 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
1
Max Memory Channels
8
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
135 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1107 MHz
256
Shader Units
1536
16
Texture Units
48
8
Raster Operation Units
6
32
Execution Units
6
45 W
Power Consumption
-
0.74 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
3.7 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-
NPU
Qualcomm Hexagon NPU
-
Theoretical performance
45 TOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Processor N200
Official Website
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 42 100
3.0
PCIe Version
4.0
9
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Celeron 3867U
2
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i7 6700HQ
3
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i7 1060G7
4
Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5
Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS
6
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
7
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i5 13600H
8
Intel Processor N200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100
9
Intel Processor N200 vs Apple M4 10 Cores
10
Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy